Search

bankruptcy

Supreme Court Decision – Will it Lead to Changes in Bankruptcy Law in Canada

by Doug Hoyes

On July 14, 2011 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in the case of Schreyer v. Schreyer. Why are we discussing a Supreme Court of Canada decision in a blog about bankruptcy in Canada? Because this case confirms a long held principle of bankruptcy law, but it also forces us to consider whether changes to bankruptcy law are required.

You can read the entire case on the Supreme Court of Canada’s website, but here’s a simple summary:

Doug Hoyes, Bankruptcy Trustee

Doug Hoyes, Bankruptcy Trustee

Mr. and Mrs. Schreyer divorced in 1999, and as is standard procedure, their assets were to be divided amongst them. Mr. Schreyer was to make an equalization payment to Mrs. Schreyer of about $41,000.

Where both parties own assets, and one of the parties will be retaining one of the assets, that party pays the other their share.

For example, if the wife’s only asset are shares in a business worth $100,000, and the husband has no assets, upon divorce the wife may be required to make an equalization payment of $50,000 to the husband. By doing so, after the divorce, they both end up with $50,000 in assets, so they each have half of the total assets they had while married.

In the case of Schreyer v. Schreyer the asset was a family farm, and Mr. Schreyer was ordered to pay $41,000 as an equalization payment to his wife.

However, before that payment was made, Mr. Schreyer declared bankruptcy. Mrs. Schreyer therefore became a creditor of his in his bankruptcy. Under Manitoba’s The Judgments Act, the family farm was exempt from execution by creditors.  That meant that Mr. Schreyer kept the farm when he went bankrupt, and his wife got nothing.

(It should be noted that the law is different in each province. For example, in Ontario there is no exemption for real estate, so in Ontario if the bankrupt owned a farm worth $80,000, the trustee may sell the farm and distribute the proceeds to the creditors, so had this happened in Ontario, Mr. Schreyer would have lost the farm when he went bankrupt, or he would have been required to pay into his estate the value of the farm).

Is this fair?

According to bankruptcy law, your debts are extinguished when you go bankrupt, so on that basis yes, it’s fair.

However, the Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act does give special treatment for child support, in section 178 (1) (c), which states that the following debt or obligation is not discharged in a bankruptcy:

any debt or liability arising under a judicial decision establishing affiliation or respecting support or maintenance, or under an agreement for maintenance and support of a spouse, former spouse, former common-law partner or child living apart from the bankrupt;

In other words, if you go bankrupt, you are still required to pay child and spousal support.

So, why, if you file bankruptcy in Canada, are you not required to make equalization payments to your former spouse? That’s a good question, and I suspect that the law will be changed to close this loophole; it’s certainly received a lot of press since the decision was released, including these articles:

Parliament moves slowly, so we shall see how long it takes for the government to act.  Regardless of their speed, I believe that it is time for the government to change the rules regarding divorce and bankruptcy.

Posted on Monday, July 18th, 2011
Filed under: bankruptcy Canada andbankruptcy reform
posted by Doug Hoyes @ 3:22 am 1 Comment

Gift Cards are Worthless if the Store is Bankrupt

by Doug Hoyes

Gift cards are a nice, convenient gift, but what happens if the store declares bankruptcy in Canada? The answer: you’ve got a problem.

Last week Global TV News ran a story about the bankruptcy of Tabi, a large women’s clothing retailer with 78 stores across Canada. All stores are being liquidated, and the liquidator is not allowing customers to spend their gift cards. You can watch the entire story here:

Have you ever wondered why almost every store, including grocery stores, have a gift card program? Obviously they want to encourage you to shop at their store, but that’s only part of the story. They have gift cards because they are very profitable, for two reasons:

First, statistics show that if a gift card is not redeemed within the first few weeks, it’s likely that it will not be redeemed at all. Gift cards can be easily forgotten or lost. That’s great for the store, because they sell a $50 gift card and in many cases don’t have to provide any product. That’s a 100% profit for the store.

Second, even if the gift card is used, it’s common for the gift card not to be used in full. If you have a $100 gift card and buy something for $95, what are the chances that you will go back to the store later to redeem the final $5? It’s unlikely, and in that case the store increased their profits by 5%, so again, stores love gift cards.

What can you learn from this story?

A gift card is not something you want to keep for a “rainy day“. If you get a gift card as a gift, spend it. It won’t increase in value, and there is always the chance that the store will go bankrupt, so the sooner you spend it, the better. Tabi was in business for 30 years, so if they can go bankrupt, anyone can.

The prudent approach is to use the gift card for something you were going to buy anyway. If it’s for clothing, decide what clothing you will need to purchase in the next few months, and purchase it now. You can use the gift card for luxuries, but by buying what you need you save your money.

Finally, think twice before giving a gift card as a gift. Is it likely that the recipient will use it, or is it to a store they don’t shop at so it might not be used? If in doubt, give gift cards that are redeemable at many different locations, and at stores that sell a wide variety of goods, so they are most likely to be used.

If in doubt, and you can’t think of a gift, give cash. Bankruptcy in Ontario, or anywhere in Canada can happen. Losing a $50 gift card is easy; it’s much less likely that someone will forget about a fifty dollar bill. Gift cards are convenient, but spend them quickly.

Posted on Monday, April 4th, 2011
Filed under: bankruptcy Canada
posted by Doug Hoyes @ 7:34 am 3 Comments

Bankruptcy Rate Drops in Canada

by Doug Hoyes

The bankruptcy rate in Canada dropped in 2010, according to statistics recently released by the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy. That’s good news, right? Yes and no.

First, let’s review the numbers. In 2010 a total of 135,008 Canadians filed a consumer proposal or personal bankruptcy. That’s an 11% drop from the 151,712 who filed in 2009. That’s a drop of 16,704 people, and yes, that’s good news. Fewer Canadians declared themselves insolvent in 2010. Now let’s take a look behind the numbers.

Personal Bankruptcy Rate Falls, By Consumer Proposals Increase Dramatically

Personal bankruptcies dropped from 116,381 to 92,694, a drop of over 20%. But consumer proposal filings increased by almost 20%, increasing from 35,331 to 42,314.

So why did personal bankruptcy filings drop, while consumer proposal filings increased? Two reasons:

First, the economy in Canada was somewhat better in 2010 than it was in early 2009, as we were still in “recovery mode” after the credit crisis and stock market correction in late 2008. A better economy generally means lower unemployment, higher consumer spending, and generally fewer personal bankruptcies. So it’s not surprising that the total number of insolvencies (bankruptcies and proposals) dropped, and that the number of personal bankruptcies also decreased significantly.

It’s also not surprising that, in a good economy, Canadians in debt are more likely to choose a proposal over bankruptcy if they can’t pay their bills. In a proposal you make a payment each month, and that money is distributed to your creditors. If you don’t have a job or a source of income, a proposal probably isn’t possible. If you are working and do have an income (just not enough to pay your bills in full), then a consumer proposal is a great solution. Clearly there is a greater chance of Canadians having jobs during good economic periods, so during recessions proposal filings are likely to drop, while in good times they may proportionately increase.

Second, the government changed the bankruptcy rules in 2009, making bankruptcy more expensive for Canadians with surplus income. As a result, in 2010 more Canadians chose to file a consumer proposal as a way to avoid bankruptcy.

So yes, it’s good news that bankruptcy numbers are down, but you have to take the numbers with “a grain of salt”, since part of the decrease in bankruptcy filings was due to a change in the rules.

Also, let’s not forget that debt in Canada remains a ticking time bomb, and massive credit card debt continues to lead to bankruptcy in Canada. Year to year bankruptcy numbers may rise and fall, but over the long term, as long as our debt remains high, Canadian will continue to file bankruptcy.

If you are interested in 2010 bankruptcy statistics for other areas of Canada, here’s list of other articles on bankruptcy statistics

If you are experiencing financial problems and think bankruptcy might be the answer, use our free debt options calculator to review your options, and then contact a licensed bankruptcy trustee today for a free initial consultation, and be sure to ask about a consumer proposal, the number one alternative to bankruptcy.

Posted on Monday, March 28th, 2011
Filed under: bankruptcy Canada
posted by Doug Hoyes @ 7:44 am No Comments

Massive Credit Card Debt Leads to Bankruptcy in Canada

by Doug Hoyes

Look in the mirror. It’s likely that you have more in common with the average person who files bankruptcy in Canada than you may think.

My name is Douglas Hoyes, a trustee with Hoyes, Michalos & Associates Inc. in Ontario, and today we released Joe Debtor, The Face of Bankruptcy, a comprehensive new research study profiling the average person who files a consumer proposal or bankruptcy in Ontario. We call this average person “Joe Debtor”.

Who is Joe Debtor? What does he look like?

Joe Debtor looks just like the average Canadian. He has a job, and may also own a home. He is very similar to the average person. The only difference between Joe Debtor and the average Canadian is that Joe Debtor has a huge amount of debt.

Here are some facts:

Comparison of Joe Debtor to Average Canadian
Personal Information:
Joe Debtor
Average Canadian
Male1 58% 49%
Female1 42% 51%
Average age2 41 41
Married or Common-law3 45% 52%
Divorced or Separated 26% 10%
Widowed 2% 6%
Single 27% 32%
Average family size3 2.3 2.6
Average monthly income4 $2,240 $2,419
Total credit card debt5 $24,390 $3,709
Total unsecured debt6 $59,814 $16,399

 

The Big Difference: Debt

Joe Debtor Debt Canada

Joe Debtor's Unsecured Debt

 

As you can see, the most significant difference between Joe Debtor and the average resident of Canada is debt. (That’s not surprising to readers of this blog; the most read post here on Trustees Talk is our post on Personal Debt in Canada: The Ticking Time Bomb.

The average Canadian has about $16,400 worth of consumer credit (debt excluding mortgages), while Joe Debtor has almost $60,000 in unsecured debt. That means that Joe Debtor has more than three and a half times as much debt, so it’s no surprise that Joe Debtor gets into financial trouble.

Simply put, debt is very dangerous.

To find out if you may have a debt problem, take this quick four question survey:

1 Are my debts, not including my mortgage, closer to the Canadian average of $16,400, or closer to Joe’s average of almost $60,000? If your debt is close to, or higher than $60,000, you owe more than Joe Debtor, and that’s an indicator that you may have a debt problem.

2 “Joe Debtor” owes $24,390 spread out over more than four credit cards. In other words, the typical bankrupt person in Canada has a lot of credit card debt. If you owe near that amount, and you are having trouble making your payments, you have a debt problem. If you are carrying a balance each month on any credit cards, you have a debt problem, because credit cards are the most expensive form of borrowing.

3 Am I afraid to open my mail? If you have bills that you haven’t opened because you know you can’t pay, you probably have a debt problem.

4 Am I “robbing Peter to pay Paul”? Do I take a cash advance from my line of credit to pay my credit card, and then next month will I take a cash advance from my credit card to make the minimum payment on my line of credit? If you are simply borrowing from one place to pay another, your debt, with interest, is gradually increasing, and you probably have a debt problem.

How can you solve your debt problem?

Start by taking inventory. Make a list of all of your debts, and the amount you owe. Make a budget to see where your money goes each month. If you can cut expenses and use the extra money to pay off your debts, great; that’s the perfect solution for you.

If you are like Joe Debtor and you have more debt than you can handle, consider filing a consumer proposal. You make one manageable monthly payment, and your unsecured debts are eliminated. If that’s not possible, filing bankruptcy in Canada may be your final option.

To find out more, use our free, on-line debt options calculator to review your options, then contact a consumer proposal administrator or bankruptcy trustee for a no-charge initial consultation.

 

1. Statistics Canada: Percentage of population over the age of 20, July 2010

2. Statistics Canada: Median age 2010

3. 2006 Census of Canada: Ontario

4. Statistics Canada: Personal Disposable Income per capita

5. Trans Union

6. Statistics Canada: Consumer Credit, Seasonally Adjusted per adult (18+)

Posted on Monday, February 28th, 2011
Filed under: bankruptcy Canada andConsumer Proposal andDebt Options
posted by Doug Hoyes @ 8:07 am No Comments

Power Spending – Getting More For Less

by Doug Hoyes

In addition to our articles bankruptcy in Canada, we occasionally review books that may be of interest to our readers. You can see all book reviews in our book review section.

Today we review Power Spending: Getting More For Less by Carolyn Johnston, Eric Poulin and Robin Poulin. I was consulted for the section of the book on debt, and bankruptcy, and in fact the Bankruptcy-Canada.ca website is referenced to describe how a consumer proposal works.

With that said, the highest compliment I can give this book is that it’s full of practical financial advice. Lot’s of book talk about theories, and explain complicated budgeting systems that no-one could ever implement in real life. That’s not a problem with this book; everyone who reads it will find dozens of practical tips they can implement in real life, immediately.

That doesn’t surprise me, because two of the authors, Eric and Robin Poulin, are the Co-Founders Calendar Budget - sign up for a free trial of CalendarBudget, the online personal finance tracking and planning tool that makes managing money easy. You simply open the program and you will see a calendar. Enter what you spent today in the calendar. That’s it! The program will then summarize where you spend your money, and help you produce easy to use graphs and charts so you can easily see where your money is going. (You can even get a free, one-month trial of Calendar Budget; after that, there is a very small cost each month).

Knowing that CalendarBudget is easy to use but also very powerful, I knew that Power Spending: Getting More For Less would also be powerful, but easy to apply and understand.

The first section starts with basic economic survival, and discusses household budgeting, emergency planning, credit and debt, and how to save money.

The second section is on Advanced Power Spending, and includes chapters on how to save money on your food bill (and since everyone eats, this should help everyone), and chapters on saving money on entertainment, travel, and even partying!

All chapters contain practical advice. Let me prove it. I opened the book randomly on five different pages; here’s a practical, easy to implement tip from each page I opened to:

  • put money aside at the beginning of the month (because if you wait until the end of the month, it won’t be there) (page 57);
  • on page 75 they have a nine step sidebar to answer the question “should I lease or buy a vehicle”; (the advice is practical, but you’ll have to buy the buy the book for the actual tips!;
  • don’t buy life insurance for your baby; the only members of your family who need life insurance coverage are those whose death would create a financial hardship (page 93);
  • on page 120 they have 19 ideas for an inexpensive date, including test driving cars, going on a picnic, and playing with animals at a pet shop;
  • on page 166 the book has six tips for how to sell stuff you no longer need by selling on-line.

As you can see, all of the tips are practical and easy to implement.

I suggest you start with the table of contents, and open the book at whatever section most appeals to you; you don’t have to, and probably won’t, read the book from cover to cover. Start where you want, use the tips, and return often for a refresher. That’s what makes Power Spending: Getting More For Less a powerful, practical book.

Posted on Monday, February 7th, 2011
Filed under: Book Reviews
posted by Doug Hoyes @ 5:31 am No Comments

The Wolf at the Door: What to Do When Collection Agencies Come Calling

by Doug Hoyes

Earlier this month we broke the story about Draft Statements of Claim – Collection Agency Dirty Trick Number One. Then, last week, we followed up with Draft Statements of Claim – More on This Questionable Collection Agency Tactic. In both articles we referred to the work of Mark Silverthorn, a former collection agency lawyer who is now working for debtors. Mr. Silverthorn is also a crusader against questionable collection lawyer tactics.

Mr. Silverthorn is the author of The Wolf at the Door: What to Do when Collection Agencies Come Calling, a new book that describes collection agency tricks and tactics, and how you can deal with collection agencies. In our on-going series of Book Reviews, today we review his new book.

I have interviewed Mr. Silverthorn (see the video in the upper right hand corner of this page), and he interviewed me for the chapters on Consumer Proposals and Personal Bankruptcy, so I am familiar with Mr. Silverthorn’s work. In our conversations he did make one comment that surprised me: He said that borrowers in Canada are often victimized three times.

First, borrowers often get caught in predatory lending practices, paying excessive rates of interest, or signing contracts they don’t understand. Interest rates in Canada are at historic lows, but interest rates on credit cards and finance company loans are as high as ever.

Second, if a borrower can’t pay, they are often victimized by abusive collection agency practices, such as the Draft Statement of Claim issue we discussed last week. In addition, collectors call at all hours of the day and night, and often make threats, and if you don’t know the rules, they can intimidate you, which is often unsettling.

Finally, borrowers are often victimized by “consultants”; people who earn their living by “helping” people, even though they really aren’t helping them at all. You have probably seen their advertisements: “We will reduce your debts by 70% without bankruptcy; call us today!” Unfortunately most of these ads are nothing more than Debt Management Scams. These unlicensed “helpers” take your money, but they have no legal ability to actually reduce your debt. They might be able to convince your creditors to accept a deal, but more often than not the only person who profits is the helper.

Mr. Silverthorn believes that an informed consumer has the knowledge to understand all options, and that’s the point of his book: education. He covers many topics, including:

  • how to stop, avoid, or discourage collection calls
  • why you might not even have to pay your debt
  • options to deal with your debts that might save you thousands of dollars
  • your legal rights and how to handle collection agency misconduct
  • the truth about credit counselling and debt settlement firms

As a bankruptcy trustee in Canada I am familiar with the various methods for dealing with debts, and I have heard every collection agency story imaginable. However, even I was able to learn many things from this book, and that’s why I recommend it for anyone looking to more fully understand how collection agents operate.

Some final advice from Mr. Silverthorn : if you meet with a debt management professional, ask them to explain all of your options, not just the option they are selling. I agree fully with that approach.

There are many debt management options. If you have access to a lump sum of money, a lawyer like Mark Silverthorn may be able to negotiate a debt settlement directly with your creditors. If you don’t have a lump sum of money, but you have an income and can make monthly payments, a consumer proposal may be your best option. In some cases personal bankruptcy is your best option. The key is that you understand all of your options, so that you can make an informed decision. The Wolf at the Door: What to Do when Collection Agencies Come Calling can help you understand your options, as can all of the information on our Bankruptcy Canada website. Or, to arrange for a no-charge initial consultation, contact a Canadian bankruptcy trustee.

Posted on Monday, November 29th, 2010
Filed under: Book Reviews andDebt Options
posted by Doug Hoyes @ 5:33 am No Comments

Draft Statement of Claim – More on the Story

by Doug Hoyes

Earlier this month Canadian bankruptcy trustee Ted Michalos published an article titled Draft Statements of Claim are a Common Collection Agency Trick, where he discussed the collection agency practice of sending a “Draft” Statement of Claim to debtors. A draft statement of claim looks like an authentic court document commencing a lawsuit against a consumer. Many Canadians who receive a draft statement of claim will think that they have been sued, when in fact, they have not. A draft statement of claim is simply a clever intimidation tactic used by collection agencies to bully Canadians, particularly individuals unfamiliar with seeing court documents.

Draft Statement of Claim

Laws regulating debt collection practices vary from province to province, and enforcement of these laws is not consistent across the country. In both Ontario and in British Columbia, provincial law prohibits anyone from using a draft statement of claim in the collection of a debt.

Unfortunately, in 2010 many collection agencies hire collection lawyers to send out draft statement of clams to the residents of these provinces despite the fact it is illegal to do so. If you have received a draft statement of claim from a lawyer’s office I would encourage you to contact a trustee to determine your options.

Since CBC News first ran this draft statement of claim story less than a month ago, this unfolding drama is gaining increasing media attention, so I decided to pursue this issue further.

Mark Silverthorn is the author of a new, controversial tell-all book about the collection industry in Canada called The Wolf at the Door: What to Do when Collection Agencies Come Calling.

He has described the draft statement of claim as “a collection letter on steroids”, and in his book he gives an insider’s view of many collection agency tactics.

Last week I interviewed Mark Silverthorn, a former collection agency lawyer, who now works exclusively on behalf of debtors.

You can watch the interview here:

As you will see in the interview, I couldn’t resist asking the obvious question: since Mark Silverthorn, many years ago, was a collection agency lawyer, and since he himself sent out tens of thousands of draft statements of claim on behalf of his clients, why is he so upset that the draft statement of claim continues to be used today when a few years ago his law firm was sending out thousands of these draft statement of claims to Canadians? I’ll let you watch the video to see his answer.

You can read Mr. Silverthorn’s side of the story on his website, or in the media.

If you are receiving calls or letters from collection agents then you probably have a debt problem. There are many strategies for dealing with collection agencies, including filing a consumer proposal or filing personal bankruptcy. Which strategy is correct for you? Contact a professional today to arrange a no charge initial consultation to review your options.

You do not need to spend weeks or months dealing with the stress of collection agency phone calls. There are options, so research your options today.

Posted on Monday, November 22nd, 2010
Filed under: Bankruptcy Alternatives andDebt Options
posted by Doug Hoyes @ 4:46 am No Comments

Credit Education Week Canada, and the Language of Money

by Doug Hoyes

Why do Canadians have problems with money? Why do we have too much debt, and no savings? Obviously the prolonged recession has not helped, but I believe one of the reasons we get into financial trouble is that we simply don’t fully understand money, credit and debt. In Canada, financial education is not a priority in our schools, or for adults once they are out of school.

That’s why I think that Credit Education Week in Canada is a great idea. It’s one week in the year when we can take the time to focus on money, and educating ourselves about credit.

Credit Education Week Canada 2010 starts today, November 15, and runs for the week, until November 19, 2010. This year’s edition is Canada’s fourth annual Credit Education Week, and the focus this year is on newcomers, and the theme is The Language of Money.

That’s an interesting concept: The Language of Money. As a bankruptcy trustee in Canada, I am very aware of how we use language to describe money, and our financial situation.

Some words are complicated; people get confused with words like “creditor” and “debtor”, and there’s little doubt that that confusion makes it difficult for people to talk about money. We don’t want to admit that we don’t know what the big words mean, so we just don’t talk about it.

(For the record, a “creditor” is someone you owe money to, like a bank or credit card company. A “debtor” is you, the person who owes the money).

Some words are easy, but they have hidden meanings. For example, what is a credit card? That’s easy, you say. A credit card is something that we use to buy things; it gives us access to credit. We all know that credit is a good thing. We all know that you should “give credit where credit is due”. When someone does something good, we should give them credit for a job well done. Credit is good.

Of course a credit card is neither good nor bad. It’s an inanimate object; it’s just a hunk of plastic. It’s how you use it that makes it good or bad.

But that’s the hidden meaning: we use the word credit card to convince ourselves that credit is good.

What would happen if we called it a debt card. Calling it a debt card makes sense; when you buy something with plastic you are incurring debt. You now have a debt that you have to pay at the end of the month, and if you don’t you will pay interest.

See the difference words can make? Calling something a debt card educates us on what it really is, and what it really does.

So, this week, as you read about Credit Education Week in Canada, pay attention to the language you use to describe money. It may give you a new perspective on how money works, and it may make it easier for you to spend less, save more, and deal with your debt.

If you can’t attend any Credit Education Week events, then educate yourself on the various methods for dealing with debt, including:

  1. Pay off your debts on your own. Make a budget, cut your expenses, and pay off your debts yourself. This works well if you owe a manageable amount.
  2. If you can afford to pay off your debts in full, but just need a break on the interest, credit counselling is an option.
  3. If you can’t afford to pay off your debts in full, but you can afford to pay back something, a consumer proposal is a logical option. Most credit card companies will accept a reasonable consumer proposal.
  4. If you can’t afford a proposal, personal bankruptcy in Canada may be your final option.

Use our free debt options calculator to educate yourself on the various options for dealing with debt.

You have the power to educate yourself, so use Credit Education Week as your opportunity to educate yourself about credit and debt. It will be time well spent.

Posted on Monday, November 15th, 2010
Filed under: Debt Options
posted by Doug Hoyes @ 2:48 am No Comments

Canadian Personal Debt A Cause for Concern

by Barton Goth

TD Economics released a report on Wednesday October 20, 2010 titled Canadian Household Debt a Cause for Concern that tried to answer many questions currently plaguing the Canadian consumer and the economy in general, including whether or not Canada is headed for a U.S.-style household debt crisis.

Barton Goth, Bankruptcy Trustee

Some of the key findings that were outlined were as follows:

1. Since the mid-1980s, total household debt as a share of personal disposable income in Canada has almost tripled – from 50% to 146%

2. Statistics demonstrate a rapid convergence in the Canadian household debt-to-income ratio similar to that of the United States.

3. At 146% of after-tax income, Canadian personal indebtedness has become excessive.

4. Economic and financial fundamentals suggest that the personal debt-to-income ratio should be in the range of 138% to 140%.

5. The past rapid growth in household indebtedness has been fuelled by both many factors, including lower borrowing costs, greater household confidence, stable inflation, relatively stable growth in the economy and labor market, increasing demand for credit, increased labor market participation by women, and a greater desire to consumer larger quantities of discretionary items.

6. Some Canadian households have become too leveraged and estimated that perhaps 10-11% of households could experience financial stress when interest rates rise in the future.

While the report’s findings appear somewhat bleak, the good news is that overall they concluded that “The Canadian debt imbalance is currently not as great as that experienced in the U.S.” They continue to say that at some point, when our current interest rates return to historically normal levels, the interest rate change will create financial stress on some Canadian households, but definitely not the majority. But this “relentless” rise of household debt in Canada is a growing cause for concern.

Is this new information? Absolutely not, one of the most cited risks to the Canadian economy is the indebtedness of the average Canadian. Is this the full story? Likely not. It is important to remember that statistics are often subjective and these statistics were designed to emphasize the negative, and I find the situation is typically not quite as bleak as is reported by the media.

However, the recent TD study identified a few positive things. For example, TD predicts that we are not on the verge of a collapse similar to what the US has suffered and demonstrated that the level of personal disposable income is still less than where the US was when everything collapsed. The key is that the average Canadian consumer has to recognize that the biggest threats to our finances, and in turn to the economy at large, are continued reliance on credit and the likelihood of future interest rate increases. The good news is we still have a time to insulate ourselves from these threats. As Canadians what we all need to take 3 steps.

1. Take Stock

2. Reduce our reliance on credit

3. Develop a plan to pay down our debt.

If you don’t already know where you sit financially it is time to find out. Begin by taking stock of your current financial circumstances. Compile a list of who you owe, approximately how much, the interest you are paying and your minimum monthly payment. Once you have done this, make note of your monthly net income and all your monthly expenses. How are you doing? Do you have enough to pay more than the minimum on each of your debts? If so, great! You are well on your way. If not, examine your expenses, establish priorities, and find a way to make things work. If your debts are too high you may have to consider the filing of a consumer proposal, a debt management plan , or potentially even a bankruptcy, depending on how severe things are. But you first need to find a way to make things work on paper.

Second, it is time to realize that credit costs. Remember, every time you use somebody else’s money, there is a cost. Sure it is nice to be able to buy anything at any time without worrying about how much cash we have in the bank. But is a sale really as good as it appears when we know we are going to have to pay 20% interest on that purchase? How many of the items that we buy on credit are truly essential? If you are going to reduce your family’s exposure to the looming interest rate increases that are inevitable, you need to move away from a credit-based lifestyle and focus on a cash-based one. After all, cash is always the cheapest way to manage your finances. It reduces the interest we pay, often forces us to consider our purchases a little more, and ultimately leads to a much healthier balance sheet. This is really a matter of discipline. Never allow yourself to purchase unnecessary items on credit. Try to only use debt to finance things that will have value at the end of the loan (i.e. car, house etc.). If this sounds difficult, then do yourself a favor by reducing the temptation. Try not carrying credit cards, detaching your line of credit from your bank card, or canceling your overdraft. Put hurdles between you and the access to credit on a daily basis. By making it more difficult to access credit, you will find that you will automatically use less credit.

Finally, it is not just enough to reduce your reliance on credit, you need a plan to pay down your debt. You will need to look at your budget and develop a strategy to reduce your debt. This may begin by consolidating your high interest debt so you can pay less interest and be out of debt quicker, or you may be able to simply by making larger payments to your debts with higher interest rates, and as each debt is paid, reallocate those debt payments to your next most expensive debt. For some you may need to consider formal avenues such as consumer proposal, a debt management plan, or a bankruptcy. Regardless of the method, your quickest way back to financial health and reduced exposure to the risk of interest rate changes, is to make a concentrated effort to pay down your existing debt.

By taking stock, reducing your reliance on credit and developing a plan to pay down your debts, you will be surprised how quickly you are able to improve the state of your finances and insulate your family from any potential difficulties down the road, whether this is increased interest rates, lapses in employment, or temporary health issues. The best advice is always to reduce your reliance on debt.

About the Author: This article has been written by Barton K. Goth of Goth & Company Inc., a licensed Edmonton bankruptcy trustee, member of the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals, and a managing editor of the Trustee Talks blog.

Posted on Monday, November 8th, 2010
Filed under: Debt Options
posted by Barton Goth @ 2:45 am No Comments

Draft Statement of Claim – Collection Agency Dirty Trick Number One

by Ted Michalos

You may be considering filing bankruptcy in Canada because you are getting telephone calls from collection agencies. Back in 2008 the Ontario Registrar of Collection Agencies wrote a letter of direction to all collection agencies operating in Ontario warning them against two specific collection practices when hiring lawyers to send out collection letters.

Draft Statement of Claim

In this letter he warned all collection agencies to stop using the “trick” of sending “draft” legal documents with their cover letters and claims to people they were contacting. These draft legal documents made it appear that the collection agency was just about to initiate legal action against the person receiving the letter – the truth was it was a simple computer template designed to scare people into making payments.

Over the years I have met with hundreds of people who have received these “Statement of Claims” from lawyers. They look real; they appear to have an official red seal on them, and they have the person’s name and address on them. They assume it’s an official court document, and that they will be required to go to court.

Here’s the truth: it is against the law for a collection agency to send out a “Draft” Statement of Claim. If you owe money to a bank or credit card company, and you don’t pay them, they are well within their rights to take you to court and sue you in an attempt to garnishee your wages.

The letter from the Ontario Registrar also warns collection agencies hiring lawyers to send collection letters to consumers that it is necessary for the lawyer to disclose the name of the entity that is paying the lawyer for the collection letter. The Registrar has taken the position that it is in the public interest to know if the creditor or the creditor’s collection agency is paying for the lawyer’s collection letter.

Collection agency laws vary from province to province, and enforcement of these laws is not consistent across the country. In January of 2011 a high-profile collection lawyer is facing a Law Society disciplinary hearing in connection with her firm’s collection practices and her firm’s use of draft statement of claims. We shall see if this disciplinary hearing results in the death of draft statement of claims in Ontario as we know it today.

If you are receiving calls or letters from collection agents then you probably have a debt problem. There are many strategies for dealing with collection agencies, including filing a consumer proposal or filing personal bankruptcy. Which strategy is correct for you? Contact a professional today to arrange a no charge initial consultation to review your options.

You do not need to spend weeks or months dealing with the stress of collection agency phone calls. There are options, so research your options today.

Posted on Monday, November 1st, 2010
Filed under: Debt Options
posted by Ted Michalos @ 5:34 am No Comments

← Previous Entries